Friday, February 22, 2008

Bob Dylan - "Tears Of Rage" (recorded 1967, released 1975)

Twenty years. That's how long I've been trying to figure it out.

"Tears Of Rage" was recorded with the Band, still known at the time as the Hawks, while Dylan was ensconced with them in Woodstock in 1967, recovering from his motorcycle accident. History has it that this was one of the first songs Dylan wrote to someone else's music - the Band's pianist Richard Manuel - but actually, that's a lot of crap because Dylan ripped off dozens of melodies in his day, it was just that this time he had to give proper credit because the Band released their own version years before his saw the light of day. And anyway, that's all besides the point because his singing style makes the specifics of melody superfluous.

In the version released by the Band on Music From Big Pink, Manuel sings as though waking up from a bad dream. Dylan, however, stared the nightmare down and what he sees is his own private version of King Lear.

Oh what dear daughter 'neath the sun
Would treat a father so
To wait upon him hand and foot
And always tell him, "No"?

There is every indication that Dylan never fully planned out song topics in advance (until "Hurricane" anyway) and the way I always heard this song, I suppose Dylan came up with a few choice images and a few catchy lines and using them, built up this impressionistic tale as a metaphor for rejection and loss of direction (much like many other songs on the Basement Tapes).

We pointed out the way to go
And scratched your name in sand
Though you just thought it was nothing more
Than a place for you to stand

Dylan almost always keeps a certain emotional distance from his best songs, jabbing with a snarl or a leer, then moving in close, bearing down on a few choice words and backing off to circle again. That's what we love best about him, after all. But there's a line at the emotional heart of this song where he's about as naked as he ever was, and you can feel him rasping against the microphone as he sings

But, oh, what kind of love is this
Which goes from bad to worse?

Though there's still an echo of the sarcastic hipster of Blonde On Blonde in the way he starts to sneer on "worse", the ache and fear in that short couplet forecast the long road from John Wesley Harding through Blood On The Tracks all the way to Modern Times. And that fear is worth spending twenty years trying to understand and come to terms with.

Lyrics copyright 1967 Bob Dylan

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

It took me along time to realize that the Basement track and the mesmerizing Joan Baez recording I knew were the same song. It gives a completely different take on the same lyrics. There's a video of Joan on You Tube - don't know from which show - but it's telling ( http://youtube.com/watch?v=QvTaUWRUkz4&feature=related )

T.

2GrandCru said...

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

The only thing the video tells me is that Baez recognized there was a blues song in it. It's cool that she saw the song's worth but there's something very egositical about her performance. She's playing it up for the wrong crowd and making a sculpture of her voice. The wrong reading, from my perspective. Anyone who would even think of performing this song at that setting doesn't really get it.

Anonymous said...

I had a feeling you'd think so - but isn't that just the obvious take and probably even a bit unfair? She had just recorded the Dylan cover album "Any Day Now" in Nashville. This was probably some of the album's promotion on TV - no idea what the show was, but that's what TV was like then. So it's actually impressive that she chose this one despite the audience and not a fluffy "Love is just a four letter word" or something. It's not a "wrong" reading - just a powerful, feminine, Odetta-like reading, that works with the lyrics at least as well as the disempowered men whining in the Band recordings... But you probably don't like Baez anyway.

2GrandCru said...

OK, I don't like Baez. :)

I think in general, singing the song from a mother's perspective robs it of that certain Biblical/Shakespearean subtext. I understand what you're saying about her voice, but I always found it to border on the super-egoistical.

Finally, regarding the TV appearance, I don't recall Dylan ever appearing on similar shows and he was the one the folkies accused of selling out. Was Baez appealing to such a mass market that she had to make such appearances? No, I think she was an niche player so it wouldn't have made a dent and anyway, that stogy guy nodding next to her is a real turnoff.

pv said...

The song "Tears of Rage" was actually written by Canadian Richard Manuel in 1967 about unrest in Quebec... American audiences thought it was about U.S. problems in Vietnam and U.S. cities at the time... and Manuel never "confessed" the real meaning of the lyrics - about Quebec's dissatisfaction with the rest of Canada!

PV

2GrandCru said...

Richard wrote the music, Dylan wrote the lyrics.

pv said...

That might be the way it's credited some places... but Manuel wrote most of the lyrics if not all...

pv

codasteve said...

Enjoyed visiting your site. I'm a little younger and was introduced to this song by way of the Jerry Garcia Band, who also covered this song. It is featured on the JGB release "How Sweet It Is." Obviously Jerry and the Dead covered a lot of Dylan and I love how much Jerry gives to this song and, at least on this particular recording, his solo is my favorite of all time. Profile pic...Parc Guell, Barcelona? Cool.